TOP 200 PLAYERS

IN BASEBALL HISTORY

and much more...

Good morning All! Before we get started, I want to say Happy Thanksgiving to everyone! I likely will not write again until Monday, so be sure to also check out my Thanksgiving Special from last year for some fun reading.

Today, we will be finalizing Justin Ahern's Top 100s list with a look at the Top 200 overall players of all time. For those of you new to this site, or if you have not seen these lists yet, here are the positional Top 100s. If you would like some background on the process used to develop this report and ranking, please click here.

All-Time Top 100: Catchers

All-Time Top 100s: First Basemen

All-Time Top 100s: Second Basemen

All-Time Top 100s: Third Basemen

All-Time Top 100s: Shortstops

All-Time Top 100s: Left Fielders

All-Time Top 100s: Center Fielders

All-Time Top 100s: Right Fielders

If you have any questions for me, or if you have any questions for Justin, please e-mail me, and I will be sure to forward your thoughts to him.

Let's get to it, the Top 200 players in major league history according to the Justin Ahern rankings. If you want to see the full rankings of all players from each position, click here.

 

Rank	Player	Year Born	Total
1	Babe Ruth	1895	208.65
2	Barry Bonds	1964	201.62
3	Honus Wagner	1874	190.98
4	Mickey Mantle	1931	189.13
5	Ted Williams	1918	186.65
6	Ty Cobb	1886	183.04
7	Tris Speaker	1888	180.26
8	Willie Mays	1931	176.40
9	Stan Musial	1920	173.10
10	Lou Gehrig	1903	170.71
11	Rogers Hornsby	1896	170.18
12	Joe Morgan	1943	169.72
13	Hank Aaron	1934	168.32
14	Eddie Collins	1887	167.91
15	Nap Lajoie	1874	160.08
16	Mike Schmidt	1949	159.97
17	Joe DiMaggio	1914	159.08
18	Frank Robinson	1935	158.61
19	Mel Ott	1909	158.60
20	Rickey Henderson	1958	155.51
21	Eddie Mathews	1931	155.20
22	Jimmie Foxx	1907	154.63
23	Dick Allen	1942	154.62
24	Jeff Bagwell	1968	154.01
25	Alex Rodriguez	1975	152.63
26	Will Clark	1964	152.08
27	Carl Yastrzemski	1939	152.02
28	George Brett	1953	150.66
29	Arky Vaughan	1912	150.65
30	Frank Thomas	1968	150.31
31	Pete Rose	1941	149.98
32	Craig Biggio	1965	149.87
33	Gary Sheffield	1968	147.83
34	Wade Boggs	1958	147.45
35	Tim Raines	1959	147.39
36	Willie McCovey	1938	147.14
37	Mike Piazza	1968	146.65
38	Mark McGwire	1963	145.81
39	Home Run Baker	1886	145.60
40	Joe Jackson	1889	145.57
41	Reggie Jackson	1946	145.47
42	Jason Giambi	1971	145.32
43	Ryne Sandberg	1959	145.05
44	Sam Crawford	1880	144.23
45	Johnny Bench	1947	144.18
46	Cal Ripken Jr.	1960	143.56
47	Robin Yount	1955	143.40
48	Tony Gwynn	1960	143.27
49	Ken Griffey Jr.	1969	142.41
50	Rod Carew	1945	142.37
51	Ed Delahanty	1867	142.32
52	Yogi Berra	1925	142.20
53	Paul Waner	1903	142.00
54	Sammy Sosa	1968	141.95
55	Albert Pujols	1980	141.44
56	Jackie Robinson	1919	141.28
57	Charlie Gehringer	1903	141.24
58	Roberto Alomar	1968	141.14
59	Duke Snider	1926	141.03
60	Al Simmons	1902	140.63
61	Johnny Mize	1913	140.42
62	Jesse Burkett	1868	140.40
63	Harmon Killebrew	1936	140.07
64	Billy Hamilton	1866	139.87
65	Willie Stargell	1940	139.79
66	Eddie Murray	1956	139.62
67	Ron Santo	1940	139.55
68	Joe Medwick	1911	138.52
69	Manny Ramirez	1972	138.51
70	Sherry Magee	1884	137.06
71	Frank Howard	1936	136.98
72	Roberto Clemnte	1934	136.93
73	Elmer Flick	1876	136.32
74	Harry Heilmann	1894	136.27
75	Paul Molitor	1956	136.25
76	Billy Williams	1938	136.20
77	Al Kaline	1934	136.16
78	Ken Singleton	1947	136.14
79	Bobby Grich	1949	136.10
80	Chipper Jones	1972	136.07
81	Bobby Bonds	1946	136.02
82	Dan Brouthers	1858	136.01
83	Joe Cronin	1906	135.91
84	Barry Larkin	1964	135.40
85	Dave Parker	1951	135.33
86	Jimmy Wynn	1942	135.26
87	Jim Thome	1970	135.06
88	Larry Doby	1923	135.01
89	Luke Appling	1907	134.67
90	Jim Edmonds	1970	134.58
91	Gary Carter	1954	134.44
92	Dave Winfield	1951	134.30
93	Bernie Williams	1968	134.21
94	Roger Connor	1857	134.02
95	Scott Rolen	1975	133.97
96	Ralph Kiner	1922	133.56
97	Charlie Keller	1916	133.27
98	Hank Greenberg	1911	133.25
99	Bobby Murcer	1946	132.99
100	Dale Murphy	1956	132.97
101	Albert Belle	1966	132.89
102	Wally Berger	1905	132.86
103	Stan Hack	1909	132.77
104	Goose Goslin	1900	132.35
105	Rafael Palmiero	1964	132.05
106	Don Mattingly	1961	132.03
107	Kirby Puckett	1961	131.88
108	Bobby Abreu	1974	131.77
109	Fred Clarke	1872	131.72
110	Frankie Frisch	1898	131.66
111	Tony Perez	1942	131.66
112	Keith Hernandez	1953	131.20
113	Cesar Cedeno	1949	131.11
114	Al Rosen	1924	131.05
115	Mickey Cochrane	1903	130.64
116	Pedro Guerrero	1956	130.54
117	Jack Clark	1955	130.42
118	Ernie Banks	1931	130.35
119	Sal Bando	1944	130.16
120	John Olerud	1968	130.05
121	Lou Boudreau	1917	130.03
122	Reggie Smith	1945	129.95
123	Rusty Staub	1944	129.82
124	Todd Helton	1973	129.60
125	Zack Wheat	1888	129.45
126	Earl Averill	1902	129.38
127	Alan Trammell	1958	129.26
128	Norm Cash	1934	129.21
129	Joe Torre	1940	129.18
130	Bill Dickey	1907	129.07
131	Benny Kauff	1890	129.01
132	Lou Brock	1939	128.84
133	Edgar Martinez	1963	128.81
134	Edd Roush	1893	128.72
135	Orlando Cepeda	1937	128.41
136	Hack Wilson	1900	128.39
137	Richie Ashburn	1927	128.19
138	Carlton Fisk	1947	128.08
139	Jose Canseco	1964	128.07
140	Heine Groh	1889	127.96
141	Darryl Strawberry	1962	127.74
142	Derek Jeter	1974	127.70
143	Luis Gonzalez	1967	127.69
144	Brian Giles	1971	127.68
145	Bill Terry	1898	127.62
146	Carlos Delgado	1972	127.58
147	Vladimir Guerrero	1976	127.52
148	Frank Chance	1877	127.25
149	Jeff Kent	1968	127.20
150	George Burns	1889	127.07
151	Vada Pinson	1938	127.05
152	Rocky Colavito	1933	127.01
153	Fred McGriff	1963	127.00
154	Fred Lynn	1942	126.94
155	Roy White	1943	126.78
156	Jimmy Sheckard	1878	126.77
157	Billy Herman	1909	126.50
158	Andre Dawson	1954	126.36
159	Hugh Duffy	1866	126.36
160	Minnie Minoso	1922	126.29
161	George Davis	1870	126.14
162	Darrell Evans	1947	126.04
163	Dwight Evans	1951	125.90
164	King Kelly	1857	125.87
165	Lou Whitaker	1957	125.83
166	Bill Dahlen	1870	125.76
167	Bobby Bonilla	1963	125.63
168	Jim Rice	1953	125.50
169	Joe Kelley	1871	125.39
170	Vern Stephens	1920	124.97
171	Pee Wee Resse	1918	124.91
172	Roy Campanella	1921	124.77
173	Enos Slaughter	1916	124.75
174	Tony Oliva	1940	124.67
175	Brooks Robinson	1937	124.55
176	Edgardo Alfonzo	1973	124.45
177	Roger Maris	1934	124.16
178	Ted Simmons	1949	124.15
179	Jim Fregosi	1942	124.11
180	Nomar Garciaparra	1973	124.03
181	Larry Doyle	1886	124.00
182	Bill Freehan	1941	123.98
183	Jose Cruz	1947	123.97
184	Tip O'Neil	1858	123.89
185	Amos Otis	1947	123.88
186	Ivan Rodriguez	1971	123.88
187	Hughie Jennings	1869	123.83
188	George Van Haltren	1866	123.36
189	Roy Thomas	1874	123.36
190	George Foster	1948	123.14
191	Max Carey	1890	123.12
192	Willie Keeler	1872	123.05
193	Andruw Jones	1977	122.99
194	Ken Caminiti	1963	122.99
195	Dixie Walker	1910	122.76
196	Fielder Jones	1871	122.75
197	Larry Walker	1966	122.72
198	George Sisler	1893	122.70
199	Cap Anson	1852	122.68
200	Ozzie Smith	1954	122.61

 

Now, I'm not going to do any in-depth analysis of this list. Maybe I should have cut it off at 100, but there are a lot of really good names in the next 100. Kirby Puckett ranking #107 is pretty good. Tony Oliva sits at #174. I am still shocked at how low Ivan Rodriguez is. It is always fun to see how the contemporary players are doing. I'm not surprised that Barry Bonds is #2. I impressed by his lead over Honus Wagner. The difference between them is essentially the difference between Albert Pujols at #55 and Al Rosen at #124. The next high currently player is Jeff Bagwell, but there are a lot of fun names to see in this. Again, I don't think a lot of times that current players get the credit they deserve. Well, I think that this list shows that we are watching some pretty good players.

 

If you would like to see more of the Top 100 lists, or who ranks in the Top 900 players, please click here. If you have any questions or comments on this list or others for me or Justin Ahern, please e-mail me. We'd love to hear you thoughts.

 

 

TWINS THOUGHTS

 

$10 MILLION PER YEAR FOR RADKE??

According to David Pinto at Baseball Musings, it may cost the Twins $10 million a year to keep Brad Radke. According to a LaVelle E. Neal article in the Strib yesterday, Radke and his agent are now looking for a three year contract instead of the two year deal he has been asking for until now. In the same article, he mentions that Kris Benson signed a 3 year, $22.5 million deal to stay with the Mets.

 

Putting the two articles together, I think that Radke will remain a Twin, and probably for less than $10 million a year. However, the fact is that I am positive that the Red Sox and Yankees are likely going hard after the services of Brad Radke and are likely offering him more than $10 million a year for three years. The Twins already have offered Radke a two year, $15 million contract ($7.5 million per). I believe they were under the impression that Radke wanted a two year deal. If the Twins came back with the 3 year, $22.5 million (third year at the same $7.5 million salary) offer that Benson signed for, maybe Radke would take it. However, Radke is certainly better than Benson. I would even offer a 4th year to the contract for $8 million which would vest if Radke pitched 200 innings in both 2005 and 2006.

 

I guess my question to you is this: If it would cost the Twins 3 years and $30 million to retain Radke, do you do it? Or, at that point, do you look at Carl Pavano or Derek Lowe and go after them for that 2 year $15 million deal? Send me your thoughts.

TWINS SIGN CASTRO
Last week, the Twins signed OF Jason Tyner. That transaction, although minor, at least made sense to the Twins organization. Tyner could fit onto the Twins roster if necessary, but he probably will fill the CF spot to the Rochester Redwings.

Yesterday, the Twins announced that they had signed infielder Juan Castro. To call Castro a light-hitting utility infielder is probably being kind. Although he is not a common name to many Twins fans, he has played in the big leagues each of the last ten seasons. He came up with the Dodgers in 1995 and was with them through the 1999 season. Then in 2000 he went to the Reds where he played through last year. The last two seasons, he has played in 113 and 111 games.

 

Apparently Ron Gardenhire wanted him. Terry Ryan was quoted as saying, "I want to make sure we have people there that can pick up the ball, and I know he can do that. I know it's not going to make a big dent in the industry, but I think this is going to help us.''

 

I read one thing when reading this statement. I read, "We don't think that Jason Bartlett can field the position at SS, so we want to find someone who will."

 

So, he must be a good defensive player, right? He must be as good as other options such as Pokey Reese and Craig Counsell, right? Well, let's look at Castro's career defensive statistics. As a SS, his career fielding percentage is .975, compared to the league average of .969 (Guzman .972). But, if you believe in Zone Rating (I really don't), the numbers don't look so favorable. His ZR is 2.90 (Guzman 4.23). League average is 3.92. Ick! How about as a second baseman? His fielding percentage is .988, compared to the league average of .982 (Rivas .983). Again, looking at his ZR, he is at 3.52 while the league average is at 4.33 (Rivas 4.02). And finally, at 3B, his fielding percentage is .959 with the league average at .955 (Koskie .966). However, his ZR is 1.29 compared to the league average of 2.31 (Koskie 2.51). In other words, it appears that Castro makes most of the plays that he gets to; he just doesn't get to very much.

 

We can hope that what this signing does is gives the Twins a late-inning defensive replacement at SS for Jason Bartlett, or even a Denny Hocking-like utility infielder. But if that is the case, why give him two guaranteed years and at least $2.05 millions, with incentives that could make him a lot more money. The incentives are based on playing time. Well, if he plays too much, his defense is probably a liability and his offensive numbers are horrendous. Yes, even more horrendous that Cristian Guzman! (One positive from this article is it does say that Michael Cuddyer is the front-runner to be the Twins 2B next year!! Yay!)

 

Overall, this is a very confusing signing. I don't think it makes any sense. Does it tell us that the Twins won't be signing Corey Koskie and hence want another option there? Does it tells us that the Twins just aren't confident in Jason Bartlett? What does it mean for Nick Punto and Augie Ojeda since Juan Castro is not better than either one of them yet has been given guaranteed money?

 

I can only say a couple of things that are positive. First, Terry Ryan has a good history of picking out guys from other organizations who can fit into the Twins plans and do well. I guess we can just hope that this is another case of that. Ryan finds the diamonds in the rough. What makes this weird is that Castro is a 10 year veteran who is already 32 years old. I think if he had any hidden talent, someone else might have found it and brought it out of him.

 

In general, I just don't understand this signing at all. I asked a couple of people closer to the Reds organization than myself for a few thoughts on Castro.

 

The first is from none other than David Bergner, aka The Baseball Savant. (Note, I asked him for a paragraph or two on the topic, and here's what we've got)

Juan Castro!

 

All anyone really needs to think about when debating on whether Castro can play or not is his career hitting line. Before we get to that however, let also remind ourselves that Castro has been in the major leagues in some capacity for a decade now! You'll understand how this has to be an egregious error made by the Cincinnati Reds management team once I give you his career batting stats, which are:

 

1599AB; .226 BA; .269 OBP%; .331 SLG%

 

The thought on Castro is that he's a defensive wizard, which marks his only justification for being in the big leagues, but depending on what "defensive metric" you look at, Castro sometimes measures as a below average fielder. Zone Rating bear this out. I think in Cincinnati's case, they mostly went with infielders that looked to hit such as Russ Branyan, Aaron Boone, Barry Larkin, etc. With Castro, it gave the Reds at least a "supposed" upgrade on defense in order to pick up the slack from the other guys who were thought to be defensive liabilities.

 

I'm assuming that is what Minnesota is thinking as well. Next season the Twins could be looking at an infield of Tiffee, Bartlett, Rivas, and Morneau. I'm not as close to the Twins situation as you are, so I could be way off on that projection, but the only justification I can think of why Minnesota would invest in Castro is that they are thinking the same way and will occasionally need to shore up the defense because Tiffee, Bartlett, and Morneau are projected at best to be league average defenders.

 

The thing that seems bad for Twins fans is that it might mean that Minnesota thinks that they aren't bringing Koskie back. Koskie is a great fielder so only having Bartlett at SS doesn't make the defense extremely worse, but adding in Tiffee makes the whole left side of the infield bad. I've been reading reports about how Castro is going to be competing for time at SS, but that doesn't make any sense. The guy spent a tremendous amount of time clogging up 3B for the Reds, so why would Minnesota be any different when they have their best SS prospect coming up and their star 3B leaving with Matt Moses not ready for the majors yet?

 

The other interesting thing about this deal is that the Twins gave Castro a 2-year 2.05 million dollar deal. At the beginning of 2003, the Reds extended Castro's contract at 2-years for 1.7 million. Castro is horrible so why the increase in pay? You would have thought that Ryan would have went to the free agents in the minor leagues in order to produce a guy with decent defense that hits .210 instead of signing a guy to a two year deal.

 

As a Reds fan, I'm glad to see Castro go. As a Twins fan, I would think you'd have to be scratching your head at this one. The only thing Castro probably would be useful for is a late inning defensive replacement that had not shot at coming up to bat. If that is what the Twins wanted and a good rate for those types of players is 2-years for 2 million, then good job Minnesota. If Castro gets significant playing time, the it's a major blow to an offense that wasn't that good to begin with com ingoffoftheir2004season.Withfull seasons of Morneau and Mauer, maybe they can cover up Castro's deficiencies. Who knows? It'll be interesting to see what happens because the last couple of years in Cincinnati, Castro found his way into the lineup the majority of the time.

 

That was more than a couple of paragraphs! Sorry for the long windedness!

I guess David had a few opinions on Juan Castro! Thanks David!

 

Another excellent blogger is JD Arney, who writes Reds Daily. He wrote about the Twins signing of Castro. Here is his opening sentence, followed by his closing statement in Castro:

"The long local nightmare of the tri-state area is no more."

"Juan Castro is gone, and Cincinnati can now move forward. Huzzah!"

Later, in an e-mail to me, here are some further comments on Castro, and the Twins signing of him:

May God have mercy on your soul.

No seriously, he's really bad.  Really, really bad.  He'll do some impressive things on defense, but most of the defensive metrics say he's below average.  I'm thrilled to death to be rid of him, and I'm sorry you guys had to take him.

I kind of wonder why you guys didn't go after Larkin if you were wanting an infielder.  He might have been more expensive, but he seems a lot more valuable than Castro.  You think Rivas is bad?  Just wait.

The Twins only have a certain amount of money to spend. Why spend a million dollars on someone who can't hit or play great defense, especially when there are cheaper options within. To me, that was just a wasted million dollars that could have been given to Corey Koskie or Brad Radke!

 

Do you have any thoughts? E-mail me.

 

Other Twins Bloggers Thoughs on the Castro signing: Twins Geek, Aaron's Baseball Blog, Will's Twins Blog, and the Dickie Thon Twins Fan Forum.

 

TWINS SIGN REDMOND

As upset as I would be about the Juan Castro signing, I am equally happy about the Twins signing of catcher Mike Redmond to a 2 year deal worth just under $2 million. Henry Blanco opted out of his contract, and the Twins didn't really need to wait for him to bring his salary demands down. Not when they can sign a backup catcher who can actually hit along with being a highly thought-of defensive catcher. Mike Redmond is jut that.

TRIVIA ANSWER - On Monday I asked the following trivia question.

Which current Twins player was a walk-on at Texas A&M and was told to go to a junior college because he was not going to beat out Jason Tyner for playing time?

Thanks to those who responded. I bet there were a couple of dozen who tried to answer the question, and for the most part, you got it right. The correct answer to the question is none other than Lew Ford. It's funny that it isn't always the big bonus-babies that make it. Sure, they get the big money and are given extra chances, but the players that most deserve it are the guys that last in the league.

 

BLOG SPOTTING

 

I mentioned these first two blogs yesterday, despite there not being a new entry. But if you missed them, please check them out. Here are a couple of other sites you should check out over the Thanksgiving weekend!

 

No New entry on Tuesday. Be sure to check out the other Twins blogs out there, especially the Twins Geek last entry on the Star-Tribune site for the near future. He does a great job of discussing the struggle between bloggers and main stream media. It's interesting.

 

I also encourage everyone to read a great entry from last week at Dodger Thoughts called The Disposable Blogger. It really describes just how tough this blogging thing is. I had intended on doing an entire entry in response to this great article, but just have not had the time. I really don't think people realize just how much work it is. I know that, like some mentioned in the article, my web site is good for about six more months at which point I need to determine whether I want to continue, if I can afford to continue, if I would like to get my life back, etc. It is a great article and I would love to hear your thoughts and suggestions for me! Please e-mail me.

 

Mark Cuban discussed Donald Trump filing for bankruptcy. Ouch!

 

Brent Net and Mark Cuban discuss the Ron Artest/Detroit/Riot situation. By the way did you listen to Artest on the Today Show? He spoke and didn't really answer any of the questions well. He stressed staying positive and not supporting what he did and to watch the tape and it would tell the story. He also frequently pointed to his album which is now available. Did you also happen to here Katie Couric then interview Billy Hunter, the NBA Players Association's leader? I like when he said "Mr. Artest is not very articulate." That made me laugh. And speaking of non-good people, how about that Josh Green guy that started the whole thing. Nice criminal record that he has!

 

ShutUpTimMcCarver.com - I don't know a lot about this site, but if you're like me, you feel this very sentiment! 

 

WOLVES THOUGHTS

 

The Wolves got a huge win at Dallas on Monday night. Sure the Mavs were playing without stars Dirk Nowitzki and Michael Finley, but a win on the road, no matter what, is impressive. When you consider that the Wolves were down by as many as 15 in the third quarter and by 12 with 4 1/2 minutes to play, to come back and win is great. Kevin Garnett led the way with 21 points, 17 rebounds and nine assists, again just one assist shy of a triple-double. But he was especially huge down the stretch. He hit two free throws with less than six seconds in the game to give the team the lead. Trenton Hassell got the assignment on the defensive end against Jerry Stackhouse and blocked his shot at the buzzer, ensuring the 83-82 Wolves win. Sam Cassell scored 16 and Troy Hudson chipped in 11.

 

But back-to-backs are tough in the NBA, especially when one is on the road and one is at home, as the Wolves have had to deal with a lot already this season and will throughout. Last night, they played the NBA's first ten win team, the Seattle Supersonics. Seattle has an excellent outside shooting team with Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis, Vladimir Radmanovich and others. And last night they were hitting their shots. They got off to a big lead and the Wolves just looked lethargic in playing catch-up all night. Lewis led with 27 points. Allen had 24 and Radmanovich had 17. The Wolves were led, as always, by Kevin Garnett. He had 16 points, 14 rebounds and 6 assists. It was the first time this year he was held to under 20 points. Wally Szczerbiak also had 16 points. Fred Hoiberg only missed one shot and scored 14. Troy Hudson scored 14 as well. But the interesting thing was that Hudson played 30 minutes. Not that that isn't a good thing, but the fact that he played the final 15 minutes of the game, while Sam Cassell (18 minutes) watched from the bench is interesting. Likewise, Latrell Sprewell played just 30 minutes and didn't play the final 15 minutes either. It could be a minor benching. Or, it could just be a way to give each additional minutes off in a back-to-back situation. They are both old. However, if that's the case, they can't really be asking for contract extensions!

 

Fact is, it is still early in the year and as talented and deep as this team is, they do still need to figure each other out. They need to find their roles. Flip Saunders needs to figure out what rotations to use. And with all that, they are still 6-4.

 

Thursday night, the team plays at Indianapolis, against the Pacers. It is a game that the team should absolutely win since the Pacers are without so much of their roster. Then the Wolves come back to Target Center on Friday night to play the Memphis Grizzlies, in what should be another tough game.

 

Any thoughts on the Wolves, please e-mail me.

 

NFL WEEK 12 "EXPERT" PICKS

Last week, we had seven panelists correctly pick 13 of 16 games. This week, we increase the degree of difficulty a notch by making everyone make their selections early! With two games on Thanksgiving, I have asked the panel to get me all of their picks before then. It may not seem like a big deal, but it is two days earlier in the week than usual. Now, we obviously have to do that for the Thursday games, but what will happen Wednesday, Thursday and Friday? Will Randy Moss play? It seems that Priest Holmes won't play, but what if something happens in the next couple of days? So, lets see who picks whom:

	Seth Stohs	Melissa Olson	Ben Jacobs	Aaron Gleeman	John Bonnes	Ryan Maus
	SethSpeaks.net	SethSpeaks.net	Hardball Times	Aaron's BB Blog	Twins Geek	Twins Chatter
Indianapolis @ Detroit	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts
Chicago @ Dallas	Cowboys	Bears	Bears	Cowboys	Cowboys	Cowboys
Cleveland @ Cincinnati	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Browns
San Diego @ Kansas City	Chargers	Chiefs	Chargers	Chiefs	Chiefs	Chargers
Jacksonville @ Minnesota	Vikings	Vikings	Vikings	Vikings	Jaguars	Vikings
Baltimore @ New England	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots
Philadelphia @ NY Giants	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles
Washington @ Pittsburgh	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers
Tampa Bay @ Carolina	Buccs	Panthers	Buccs	Panthers	Buccs	Panthers
Tennessee @ Houston	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans
New Orleans @ Atlanta	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons
Miami @ San Francisco	49ers	Dolphins	49ers	49ers	49ers	49ers
Buffalo @ Seattle	Seahawks	Seahawks	Seahawks	Seahawks	Seahawks	Seahawks
NY Jets @ Arizona	Cardinals	Jets	Jets	Jets	Cardinals	Jets
Oakland @ Denver	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos
St. Louis @ Green Bay	Packers	Packers	Packers	Packers	Packers	Packers
	Michael Labuda	David Bergner	David Bloom	Vic Quick	Mike Brasel	Jeremy Kovash
	ChiSox Daily	Baseball Savant	Ya Gotta Believe	KDUH-Sports	FFB Guru	Wolf Lake Mgr
Indianapolis @ Detroit	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts	Colts
Chicago @ Dallas	Bears	Cowboys	Cowboys	Cowboys	Cowboys	Bears
Cleveland @ Cincinnati	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Bengals	Browns
San Diego @ Kansas City	Chargers	Chiefs	Chiefs	Chargers	Chiefs	Chiefs
Jacksonville @ Minnesota	Vikings	Vikings	Vikings	Vikings	Vikings	Jaguars
Baltimore @ New England	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots	Patriots
Philadelphia @ NY Giants	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles	Eagles
Washington @ Pittsburgh	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers	Steelers
Tampa Bay @ Carolina	Buccs	Panthers	Buccs	Buccs	Buccs	Buccs
Tennessee @ Houston	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans	Texans
New Orleans @ Atlanta	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons	Falcons
Miami @ San Francisco	Dolphins	49ers	49ers	49ers	49ers	49ers
Buffalo @ Seattle	Seahawks	Seahawks	Bills	Seahawks	Seahawks	Bills
NY Jets @ Arizona	Cardinals	Jets	Jets	Jets	Cardinals	Jets
Oakland @ Denver	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos	Broncos
St. Louis @ Green Bay	Packers	Packers	Packers	Packers	Packers	Rams

 

That's it for today. Please feel free to let me know what you think. Have yourself a great Thanksgiving!

 

If you have any questions, comments or ideas for future topics, please e-mail me.

 

Back to Archives           Home